Talk:Agape feast

Christianity: Bible / Catholicism / Anabaptist / Methodism Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Bible portal This article is supported by WikiProject Bible (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Anabaptist work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Mormon potlucks?

Can the official (Mormon church potluck dinners) and the unofficial dinners held by many Mormon women constitute types of Agape feasts?

Prsaucer1958 (talk) 18:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If reliable secondary sources say they do, but not otherwise (not on Wikipedia, which does not publish the novel ideas nor the original research of its editors and readers. — AReaderOutThataway ^t/_c 21:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and citation cleanup needed

This article has several citation problems:

Invalid citations; the one that most stuck out was attempting to use a Google search as a source. Search results are not sources; they can be tools for editors to use off-site, looking for sources.
Incomplete and malformed citations. In particular, we cannot (per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT) cite a classical author like Tertullian and just leave it at that. Every citation has to be to a published source. Thus, such citations-to-the-ancients can read something like |title=Illegitimi non carborundum |author=Dufus Maximus the Younger |orig-year=c. 348 |work=Dufusian Electronic Archive |editor-last=Doe |editor-first=John |date=2018 |publisher=Coalition of Cooperative Institute for Organizational Association.
No consistent citation style. This is veering between WP:CS1, WP:CS2 (the {{Citation}} template), and unformatted (e.g. bare URL) citations or attempts at citations. Per WP:CITEVAR, these need to be all in one consistent format within the article. Given that CS2 is almost dead, and trying to do an article in CS2, when about 99% of editors do CS1 by default requires watchlisting it like a hawk, I would suggest moving to CS1 format.
Various parameters are being misused in citation templates (especially the CS2 template {{Citation}}, though also in some CS1 templates). I cleaned up some of this as I ran across it (e.g. removal of |language=English which is redundant since it's the default), but there's a lot of confusion in there about what is a title of a work, what is a subwork, what is a publisher, and so on. In short, please actually read the template documentation before you use the template.

— AReaderOutThataway ^t/_c 22:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Coffee hour" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coffee hour. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Fiamh ^{(talk, contribs)} 06:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coffee hour

The section on Eastern Orthodoxy currently reads:

A number of Eastern Orthodox Christian parishes will have an agape meal (Turkish: sevgi ziyafeti), commonly known as coffee hour (Spanish: café comunitario), on Sundays and feast days following the Divine Liturgy, and especially at the conclusion of the Paschal Vigil.

Why exactly are glosses being given in Turkish and Spanish? Furius (talk) 20:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To add a gloss of pseudo-scholarship? Tachypaidia (talk) 01:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]