Talk:Aircraft lease

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aircraft lease article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Simplysavvy (talk) 06:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?

Not sure it's a stub. Not much more to be said on the subject. Harry was a white dog with black spots 05:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- How about explaining the mysterious "wet" vs. "dry", "damp" etc. terminology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.26.148 (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's now explained in the article and the merger would do no harm to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msaky (talk • contribs) 22:28, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking references

There is no reason to revert references if valid and relevant. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 17:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't sure the Indigo reference was valid. It looked like spam to me in its intial incarnation. It's just a list of available aircraft. But with the additional paragraph I think it's OK. Harry was a white dog with black spots 17:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. We might want articles on "Dry Lease" and "Damp Lease" as well. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 17:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

forms of aircraft leasing

seems like wet/damp/moist/dry/frigid leasing aren't broad enough subjects to each need their own article. therefore, i suggest that this be moved to something like forms of aircraft leasing, or simply milled into aircraft finance. pauli133 (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article on aircraft leasing makes sense. Although closely relating to aircraft finance, I don't think they are coextensive, so splitting them probably makes more sense. --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree seems better to explain the different arrangements on one page. MilborneOne (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, whether on aircraft finance or aircraft leasing, either is fine with me. - BillCJ (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we go with a new combined article, I'd recommend moving Wet lease to aircraft leasing, as it has a much longer efit history, and making Dry lease a redirect there. An admin would probably have to delete the current aircraft leasing first. - BillCJ (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been BOLD, and moved the page to Aircraft lease (noun form). It needs a Lead (I have no idea what to say in it!), and the text could use some reorganization. Sorry for leaving it half done, but I wanted to jump-start the merging. - BillCJ (talk) 11:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article discuss the change to airline balance sheets given the accounting changes embodied in IFRS 16 Leases?58.6.169.136 (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but not to excessive lengths. And cite sources.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Damp Lease

As it appears in FedEx Express, the term "damp lease" links here, but that's the end of it. The term is not mentioned in this article. Clarification, please? Mfwills (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of terms "wet leases" and "dry lease".

I heard years ago that the origin of the terms "wet leases" and "dry lease" came from the fact that a wet lease contract was for a longer period of time and thus was painted in the livery of the company. Dry leases, being shorter, weren't painted. Any truth in this.--Dmol (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article could do with more content and clarification of existing content

Two useful sources so far -

http://www.pkair.com/pdf/article1.pdf

http://www.pwc.com/en_GX/gx/aerospace-defence/publications/assets/pwc-aviation-finance-fastern-your-seat-belts-pdf.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by James warne aus (talk • contribs) 14:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]