This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
The quality of the article is not quite what it should be. The comment on the software product being little more than an Excel macro is inaccurate (although I of course agree that the product was not quite it was claimed to be.) More accuracy and citations would be needed.
On a related topic, the connection between Klaus Schwab and Think Tools AG should be better covered in Wikipedia. It seems that he was properly mentioned in the Think Tools article, and Think Tools was at some point mentioned in the Klaus Schwab article, but then somebody associated with WEF has been removing these references and managed to even freeze the Think Tools article at some point. Klaus Schwab was one of the central figures, together with von Müller of course, in the raise and fall of Think Tools AG (through his promoting the company in WEF events and to VIPs like Nelson Mandela), and it is a pity that Wikipedia fails to be open about this simply because of the resistance by those people who only have something lose if the company's story were more widely known. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.143.165.49 (talk) 04:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
