Talk:Amber

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amber article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Gemology and Jewelry: Gemstones Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gemstones subpage.

Palaeontology High‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Amber is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Amber. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://academic.uprm.edu/publications/cjs/Vol37b/37_141-167.pdf
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.natmus.dk/cons/reports/2002/amber/amber.pdf
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.pipesandtobaccos.com/pipesandtobaccos/info/insights/baldoview.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://steinertindustries.com/osc/advanced_search_result.php?search_in_description=1&keywords=amber&osCsid=d8f7cf307cfb59b1356aa7e3abfaa59e

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too many images?

Would anyone agree that this page is overloaded with images? Would it be a better to condense many of the images in a gallery leaving only the pertinent images within the article? A. Z. Colvin • Talk 22:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you preserve a human in amber

Why, or why not? This should be added. If you can't, why is it that you can with insects? Is it only the hard tissues that survive when an insect is trapped in amber? The snare (talk) 22:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The snare: The short answer is no, since there are no resin masses big enough to entomb a human or other large animal. It is already covered in concept wit the mentions of smaller reptiles, amphibians, and birds in amber.--Kev min § 15:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You couldn't just gather a large amount from lots of trees? And heat it to keep it liquid until you will use it? The snare (talk) 01:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove the word "oriental" from the description of the scent.

Previously: "warm, musky, rich and honey-like, and also somewhat oriental and earthy." With edit: "warm, musky, rich and honey-like, and also somewhat earthy."

Thank you! 50.200.153.132 (talk) 20:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you for catching this. CityOfSilver 20:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324060544/http://teresacasimiro.com.sapo.pt/Bibliographic_References/21.pdf to http://teresacasimiro.com.sapo.pt/Bibliographic_References/21.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the use of the term "wastebasket" in the classifications of amber spcificaly type IV, I believe the intention is that it is something of a miscellaneous category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1015:B125:293C:71D4:AF5A:9587:B3BA (talk) 23:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amber: oldest fossil in amber

Since amber is itself fossilized plant resin the meaning of " oldest fossil found in amber" is confusing. Denniskaegi (talk) 17:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Denniskaegi: It seems pretty simple to me, its indicating things that are entombed within amber as an inclusion, and not talking about the amber itself.--Kev min § 20:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stained glass and ceramics are not plastics

Under imitation materials, there are two lists. First, young resins used as imitations, then plastics used as imitations. But the first item in the second list is "stained glass (inorganic material) and other ceramic materials". Neither of those are plastics. It does seem to be the only item that doesn't fit, and it doesn't fit the first list either, but that means something needs adjusting. Maybe a third list, maybe renaming the second list, maybe something else. --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 01:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“Healing Agent”

“used as a healing agent in folk medicine.”

is a bewildering phrase that seems deeply antithetical to the factual information on wikipedia. This phrase, especially in the intro paragraph, gives credence to the absolutely pseudoscientific belief that amber or any other crystal has some sort of biological or healing properties. At the very least some sort of qualifier to say that this is a pseudoscientific belief with no evidence should be added, but I would probably delete the whole sentence. 2601:143:8201:AE90:51A0:94E7:E31E:CE8E (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gedanite" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gedanite has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 7 § Gedanite until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 20:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]