Talk:Amejo

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amejo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Amejo. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Amejo at the Reference desk.

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:38, October 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Categories for "Race" and "Sexual Fetishism"

I placed two categories for "Race" (since this interest is racial) and for "Sexual fetishism" (since some of these relationships are obviously sexual), and they were specifically removed by user: TakuyaMurata. Edit

Rather than get into an edit war, I would like to get the reason it is felt they are not appropriate...--Joel Lindley (talk) 03:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I didn't remove the categories. But I agree with the removal because putting such categories might not be NPOV. -- Taku (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Since the article is new, I guess we'll just see how it goes from there.--Joel Lindley (talk) 19:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This terms seems either made up or not widely used. I think this makes it problematic for inclusion here. Is there a Wikipedia Japan page with this term? If not, this term is bs. --Soda80 (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is the term "BS" if there are reputable sources for the terms?--Joel Lindley (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

merge article

two terms which deserve no article YVNP (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this isn't a forum on our personal opinions on terms or articles; but, whether or not it fits Wikipedia. If you feel you can add to it, do so.--Joel Lindley (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm classification

The WikiProject classification for Amejo is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]