Jump to content

Talk:American Conservatory Theater

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spelling

[edit]

The spelling changes back and forth between "theater" and "theatre" throughout the article. Some consistency would be nice. As this article focusses on an U.S. based theater, it would seem to make sense to use the U.S. spelling here, especially since this is what the American Conservatory Theater and Geary Theater apparently use themselves. --93.212.234.15 (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done The establishment spells it "Theater" so I made changes accordingly. Some usages of the other spelling couldn't be changed either because they refer to older facilities which probably spelled it "theatre", they're in citations so it's how sources spelled it, or because in the case of the link at the top of the article to the Seattle theatrical organization also called ACT, it's spelled "re." CityOfSilver 22:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Just so we're clear, the two words are not entirely interchangeable. It is generally understood among those in the field that "a theater" is a building; while "the theatre" is an art form. So ACT's spelling, references the building in which it is housed, not the art form that is practiced inside that building. Admittedly, some theaters do employ "theatre" in naming their buildings, which does add to the confusion; but it really just reflects the fact that the traditional British spelling for the buildings is also "theatre." Please see this explanation. Accordingly, I'll correct the section to reflect distinctions. X4n6 (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Conservatory Theater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories?

[edit]

Would it be reasonable to add a category for American Conservatory Theater people? Or for alumni of its school? It would make a huge list, which might be better if was a table with the core members of the company and their tenure, but that would take a real fam to manage, I think. --Hjal (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't believe a list of "ACT people" in the article would be warranted - as a major regional theatre, many huindred of actors pass through its stage doors. Alumni of the school, yeah, that could be OK. "Core members" no, since you'd need a source or multiple sources to define was a "core member" was. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]