Talk:Amoriguard
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Speedy deletion
[edit]I believe this article meets criteria WP:A11 for speedy deletion. It is about a specific paint product, offered only by one manufacturer, that doesn't appear to have any other notability or claim of significance.
There was an ANI thread relating to this article a while ago, where it was observed that two of the accounts most responsible for this article's creation (Yyyj4) and content (Cmoon100) have conflicts of interest to the subject matter and inventor. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bbb23 To clarify, do you think this article merely doesn't meet the WP:A11 criteriai? Or do you believe this article is not worth deleting at all? PhotogenicScientist (talk) 19:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't qualify for A11. I have no opinion on whether the article should be deleted. You're welcome to start an WP:AFD.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Bbb23 Thank you. Do you think WP:PROD could be appropriate? If it doesn't meet speedy criteria, I still think there isn't enough here for deletion to be too controversial. It looks like it might be an easier alternative to WP:AFD. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- No, at this point I don't think PROD would be good. Easier isn't always best.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Bbb23 Thank you. Do you think WP:PROD could be appropriate? If it doesn't meet speedy criteria, I still think there isn't enough here for deletion to be too controversial. It looks like it might be an easier alternative to WP:AFD. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Doesn't qualify for A11. I have no opinion on whether the article should be deleted. You're welcome to start an WP:AFD.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)