Talk:Androcalva fraseri
Appearance
A fact from Androcalva fraseri appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 December 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New name
[edit]A recent revision of Commersonia and Rulingia [1] has this species placed in the new genus Androcalva as Androcalva fraseri (J.Gay) C.F.Wilkins & Whitlock. Melburnian (talk) 07:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- If this change is accepted generally, then the article should be moved to Androcalva fraseri, making this article a redirect.--Wetman (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Agree - the evidence looks pretty solid, but this article has only just come out, so was waiting a bit until I saw general uptake by our state and national herbariums. Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:36, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles