Talk:Animal husbandry/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Atsme (talk · contribs) 14:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atsme, many thanks for taking this on. Cwmhiraeth is co-nom. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Suggestion (not deal breakers) for Sect Agricultural Revolution - ...causing biodiversity to decline in lieu of fall...or causing the loss of biodiversity. One other thing - subsistence farmer's: put the 's inside the brackets. --- Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	I enjoy reviewing the work of these two co-nominators. It's always top quality.

Thank you for the review Atsme. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]