Talk:Antoine Bourdelle

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts C‑class

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent modifications by Weglinde

I've just reverted to a version that was still properly formatted and structured. Recent edits by Weglinde, beginning here, introduced a host of modifications without discussion in Talk first. That edit, and subsequent edits, introduced a giant unreferenced block of text, numerous lists (e.g., about War memorials, etc.) that belong is separate articles (e.g., List of works by Antoine Bourdelle). Discuss first, before any further modifications of the kind. Coldcreation (talk) 11:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe, Coldcreation, that the polite thing to do would be to have informed Weglinde before making your cuts. His edits were obviously well intended and represent a large amount of effort on his/her part. A warning shot across the bow is a time honored tradition that was (opinion) called for here. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You bring up a good point Carptrash. Weglinde was informed directly after the revert, not before. That said, much of that well intended effort will surely find its way back into the article, when properly sourced. And the list of works introduced into the article by Weglinde will be included in an all-encompassing (or almost so) List of works by Antoine Bourdelle, even if I have to create that page myself. One more point: it was a bold move on the part of User:Weglinde to modify the article such, and I respect that, however, it would have been more judicious on his/her part to discuss the changes here first. Coldcreation (talk) 16:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Carptrash. As you guess I did put a lot of time and effort into the edits my only Intention being to give more detail of Bourdelle's work. Coldcreation writes " even if I have to create that page myself" and in the circumstances and remembering "The Godfather" that is an offer I cannot refuse. Anyway thank you Coldcreation and Carptrash for taking an interest in this. Most appreciatedWeglinde (talk) 19:26, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done: List of works by Antoine Bourdelle. Nice job Weglinde. Coldcreation (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antoine Bourdelle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040202055806/http://www.pariserve.tm.fr:80/culture/musee/bourdelle.htm to http://www.pariserve.tm.fr/culture/musee/bourdelle.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hi! I am noticing there is an unclear citation style - nothing is listed as a reference and it appears the same reference has been used many times (with the exact same page number?). Also there is a list of books and possible future references in the section titled "Bibliography" however they are not all used in line? Would it be okay to consolidate this one reoccurring citation? Does anyone have thoughts on the citation style? Jooojay (talk) 01:55, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]