This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of streets in the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. StreetsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. StreetsU.S. city street articles
I have (partially) recreated this page, the original of which was deleted earlier today by User:Sphilbrick because it had been created by a blocked user. In (re)creating a page that usefully and accurately describes a major Philadelphia thoroughfare, I trust I am violating neither Wikipedia policies nor common sense. (While I accept that Sphilbrick acted because of the former, I can't quite see how the deletion could be described as the latter.) In any case, I hope my own action closes out this episode in a way that serves both policy and readers. PRRfan (talk) 16:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In several instances, I noted that I was deleting an article that would normally be considered a useful addition to the encyclopedia, so deleted regretfully, but understanding wp:deny. Not only no problem creating a new article, but kudos.--S Philbrick(Talk)16:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
