Talk:Archimedean point

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Physics: History Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by History Taskforce.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

old name for orthocenter?[edit]

On http://jeff560.tripod.com/o.html it says " ORTHOCENTER. An earlier term was Archimedean point. "

can somebody colloborate this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillemienH (talk • contribs) 22:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should Hawking be added under Criticism?[edit]

I don't feel qualified to explain the how of it, but in On the Origin of Time (2023), Thomas Hertog describes Hawking's final theory doing away with the Archimedean Point. Teledyn (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]