This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Linking the name Archuleta with 9th-century Berkshire seems the most absurd of the etymologies on this page. The attribution of the name to Basque origins is probably correct, but the English attribution is surely a myth. The source cited is patently bogus--complete with a supposed English coat of arms belonging to the name--totally ridiculous. If this is typical of other name pages cited to that source, then a lot of similar pages need cleanup. This ought to be referred to a genealogy or patronyms expert for verification. Wbkelley (talk) 03:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the cu tag from here as it seems OK to me, and I have contacted the editor who added it. If ayone thinks it still needs a clean-up, please edit it / add your concerns here and re-tag it, and I'll look at it again. Thanks, Boleyn2 (talk) 11:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
