Talk:Attack on USNS Card

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Attack on USNS Card article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Attack on USNS Card has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 25, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 2, 2018, May 2, 2021, and May 2, 2024.

Military history: Maritime / Asian / North America / Southeast Asia / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Attack on the USNS Card/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 14:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
The article follows a good style and layout throughout.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
References are well used.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
The articles follows the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
The article maintains a neutral point of view.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
The article does not appear to be subject to any edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Images not in the public domain have full fair use rationales.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
A very interesting read. Harrison49 (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my work.Canpark (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]