Talk:Axis mundi
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Axis mundi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Geographic pole
[edit]From the lead: "As the celestial pole and geographic pole, it expresses a point of connection between sky and earth where the four compass directions meet." Maybe sounds good and poetic, but the geographical pole doesn't represent the connection between sky and earth, is not a point and along its axis meet just north and south not the 4 compass directions. The celestial pole, do represent the points of connection between sky and earth but not between east and west. IMHO the lead would be much better without this sentence. --Dia^ (talk) 06:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Romania 20060512 - Tirgu Jiu - Coloana fara sfarsit.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Romania 20060512 - Tirgu Jiu - Coloana fara sfarsit.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
Middle Earth
[edit]The supposed occurrences in Middle Earth were utterly wrong. This motif may exist in Tolkien's writing, but Orodruin is *not* it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.228.15 (talk) 22:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Axis mundi/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I've rated this as a C because it needs more diverse and accessible references- mainly relies on one at the mo. Sticky Parkin 02:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 02:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Tagged for cleanup
[edit]This is an {{essay-entry}} with a full section of unreferenced listcruft. The topic is important, but it needs to be treated as a concept in comparative mythology in Eliade's school, and the presentation must be entirely based on Eliade's works and their later reception. People don't come here (I hope) for random waffling, there is the blogosphere for that. They come here for a concise overview of the literature on the topic. From a quick review, it appears that the literature begins with Eliade, c. 1954, but if there is earlier material (from Frazer, Jung, etc.) of course it should be included (with explicit references). --dab (𒁳) 13:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Mythology articles
- High-importance Mythology articles
- C-Class Alternative medicine articles