Talk:Bachmannia
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 23 September 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Bachmannia be renamed and moved to Bachmannia woodii. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Bachmannia → Bachmannia woodii – The name "Bachmannia" is shared by two monospecific genera: a plant genus (this article) and a fish genus (Bachmannia chubutensis). I don't think either is the primary topic, so they should both be disambiguated. Per WP:MONOTYPICFLORA, it's better to add the specific name than a parenthetical disambiguator like "Bachmannia (plant)". jlwoodwa (talk) 22:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bachmannia chubutensis has 21 views compared with only 9[[1]] for Bachmannia woodii. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Not controversial per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)