This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 17 February 2015 by reviewer DGG (talk·contribs).
This article stands as an awfully good example of why we should shun AFC if they are content to do likewise with the rest of the encyclopedia. Unfortunately, the notability of the topic would prevent me from just shuffling it off to AFD. Lessee here: a {{Refimprove}} tag dated January 2013 for an article which entered article space in February 2015, no real informational value, no connection established to what the school is best known for, tons of cleanup needed to prevent this from being a permastub and I could really go on and on. So what exact useful purpose does AFC serve, anyway? Based on this joke of an article and other things I see come across my watchlist, it's evidently a bunch of petty bureaucrats who get off on judging the contributions of others without really adding any value to the product themselves. I don't have the time to clean up this mess right now, but I guess I'll do what little I can. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I didn't look at that carefully enough. It has plenty of information in the infobox. I take it to mean that's what made it ready for prime time? (for the humor-impaired, I'm being somewhat facetious here; of course I realize that the infobox overtakes the rest of the article) RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
