Jump to content

Talk:Binghamton Crosbys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

A group membership roll appear to be quite relevant to the group being discussed, regardless of the permanency of membership. Indeed, one of the chief benefits of open editing web sources are their ability to be both comprehensive and up-to-date. --Patchyreynolds (talk) 00:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia standards do not allow for directories, membership lists, or officer lists. Please see WP:NOT#DIR. We are definitely not here so that people can list these membership lists so that people can find those people on Facebook as was suggested here. Metros (talk) 00:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia:Bio#Lists of people. Only people who are notable (i.e. those who would otherwise warrant their own articles) should be included in a list in a club/group article. See the Beelzebubs article, for example. Only four notable former singers are given, not a full list of everyone in it currently or who was ever in it. Metros (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Binghamton Crosbys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]