Jump to content

Talk:Bird Studios

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion objection

[edit]

I refer to my previous objection... That is... if my studios is not 'noteworthy' then nor are 80% of the other animation/media studios listed on Wiki... such as the ones I listed previously. What constitutes noteability? The actual histories of animation, computer animation and digital animation on Wiki... are indeed very thin, I agree. I also see that Wiki does also just list 'things' too.

Maybe it is deemed that Bird Studios have not contributed enough to the industry, although I would disagree and again refer to the 'balance' of studios that Wiki does represent.

My argument is purely that Bird Studios is as relevant as most of the other studios that you list... excepting the obvious Disney/Pixar (maybe they are the only 'noteable' studios that should be included on Wiki) and that if Bird studios is deleted, then so should 80% of the other studios listed here.

Deletion

[edit]

This page has questionable notability and i will be prodding it. Please see WP:NOTE and WP:NOT. My reasoning is:

Deletion objection

[edit]

I am the founder of Bird Studios. I have been involved with the Computer animation, tv and film industry since 1983. Everything stated in the Bird Studios page is true and it cross references with Maguffin and Cyberworld etc. Our awards are true and valid and I have been involved with the industry since the days of Bob Abel and 'Sexy Robot'. I feel that Bird Studios page is no more an advertisement than any other single studio listed on Wiki (Animafilm, Animax Entertainment, Blue-Zoo Productions, BONES, Crest Animation Studios,Saerom, smallfilms, The Mill, zagreb Film etc. etc). My company and our work is just as relevant (and referenced) and has contributed enough to the industry to be noted as much as any of those I have listed.

In the world of Computer Animation, commercials and music videos our work is of note WP:NOTE hence the awards and web presence. Bird Studios 10:26, 18 April 2007 (GMT)

I am glad to see you've added references, but please review the Wiki guidelines on how to place references inline. This page needs a lot of work. I am of the opinion that most if not all of these pages should be removed, and it remains to be seen whether this specific studio is of note. I will drop this issue for now but please bring it up to specs soon. Adam McCormick 23:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a vanity piece for the studio, have added some cn tags where references are needed. Also tidied up a ref to give example of suitable format. --Oscarthecat 16:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Bird Studios. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]