Talk:Bob Russell (television presenter)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Untitled

The only information that I have concerning Bob Russell was that he hosted the Miss America Pageant from 1940 to 1946, 1948 to 1950 and finally in 1954. Sorry we can't be of more help but no one working here now was around when Mr. Russell was the host. Thank you

Liz Puro - Office Administrator Miss America Organization 222 New Road, Suite 700 Linwood, NJ 08221 609-653-8700 ext 121 Fax: 609-653-8740 e-mail: liz@MissAmerica.org www.MissAmerica.org

Original Message-----

From: Receptionist Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:38 PM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.193.117.66 (talk) 17:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Larry Miller (entertainer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:00, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1b

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Bob Russell (television presenter). -- tariqabjotu 02:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Russell (entertainer) → Bob Russell (beauty pageant host) – (unbundled as requested) On the borderline where you'd expect (entertainer) to pass WP:CRITERIA, but his WP:Notability was mainly in long-runnning control and administration of Miss America and other pageants, and printed WP:RS sources reflect this "host Bob Russell" 5 GBooks and variants vs only "entertainer Bob Russell" 1 GBook. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support; "(entertainer)" is always a bad way to title an article, and all articles titled that way should be moved to another title. I suppose there will never be a consensus for moving certain present articles, but they are still wrong. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 13:40, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Pageant host, yes, but also tv presenter, emcee, tv show creator. The article calls him an "entertainer". Seems like the title should as well. Dohn joe (talk) 01:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AT says WP:AT CRITERIA 2. Naturalness – The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such titles usually convey what the subject is actually called in English. So that question is how do WP:IRS treat the subject, Bob Russell organizer of Miss America, per WP:CRITERIA. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support. "Entertainer" is too generic, although this may be too specific. Consider (TV personality), (TV host), (pageant host). "(beauty pageant host)" seems to win on assisting in recognizability. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~Bob Russell (television personality) or Bob Russell (TV personality) per SmokeyJoe~~ Bob Russell (television presenter); per WP:DAB and WP:AT, novel disambiguators should be avoided, and no title uses (pageant host), much less (beauty pageant host). At some point, the (TV personality) and (television personality) articles should be standardized, but for now, the usage is pretty even, so I don't have a preference there. --BDD (talk) 23:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Almost anything is better than (entertainer), and (TV show host) (pageant host) etc. are fine. The "novel" DAB argument doesn't apply here because because Category:Beauty pageant hosts is thinly populated, only 2 even need dabs, and very few of those were mainly known as beauty pageant hosts, most just did it as a sideline. The dab (television presenter) is better than "personality" - personality means Z-grade celeb fluff who appear on reality TV for their 15 minutes of fame. Bob Russell was a TV show host and TV presenter. Except that in the refs he is less known for TV and more known for Miss America which exists outside TV, as the article shows he didn't, perhaps by choice, have much of a career as TV show host outside beauty pageants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by In ictu oculi (talk • contribs) 01:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some good points. Yes, I think (television presenter) is a better choice. --BDD (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(television presenter) is also fine. As User:SmokeyJoe said "(beauty pageant host)" seems to win on assisting in recognizability, but I read SmokeyJoe also thinks it too long. (television presenter) would do, as presumably beauty pageants that weren't televised weren't too notable. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"(television presenter)" would be fine. "(beauty pageant host)" Doesn't both me for its length. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.