Talk:Bolton and Undercliffe

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bradford Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bradford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bradford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BradfordWikipedia:WikiProject BradfordTemplate:WikiProject BradfordBradford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bolton and Undercliffe is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This confused me as well, even when I lived there, but shouldn't "Bolton" should be "Bolton Woods"? There may be some literature calling it the former, but every Bradfordian I ever met, as well as lived there, calls it "Bolton Woods".

I'm not changing it, because I vaguely remember seeing it referred to as Bolton in some bit of council pamphlet might have. Or is that it's electoral ward name? Also I don't know how to change the titles of Wiki articles.

This is the region opposite Frizinghall, verging on Shipley, off Canal Road, right?

81.101.58.131 01:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, Yes...

The council ward name is Bolton & Undercliffe so this is an article about the ward.
Yes the area is generally known as Bolton Woods rather than just Bolton.
Yes this is the area on the east side of "Bradforddale", opposite Frizinghall.

Welcome to Wikipedia by the way :-)

There could easily be a separate article about Bolton Woods while that article discusses the council ward. I wrote a fair bit of this article and I just didn't know enough about this area of Bradford to say much more, it really needs expanding.

For future reference the way to change the title of the article is to click on the move link but as I've said in this instance a better option would be to create a separate article. MGSpiller 00:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I lived off Bolton Road (near Peel Park) we called it Bolton. I think Bolton Woods is different. Secretlondon 12:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference style

Why the undiscussed change in reference style to one which is not very helpful for section editing as you cannot preview the references? It also makes locating the references difficult as you expect to find the ref in the section that you are editing. It does reduce the clutter in the text but that about all. Keith D (talk) 22:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bolton and Undercliffe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bolton and Undercliffe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101127030213/http://www.bcsp-web.org/mapguide_site/maingeo.cfm to http://www.bcsp-web.org/mapguide_site/maingeo.cfm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/bradford/election_2004/bradford/bolton_and_undercliffe.shtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bradfordinfo.com/census/WardProfiles/bolton%20and%20undercliffe.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]