Talk:Bradford College

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bradford College is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bradford Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bradford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bradford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BradfordWikipedia:WikiProject BradfordTemplate:WikiProject BradfordBradford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

refs and pics please Victuallers 08:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have applied the 'advert' template, because the page currently reads like an advert.

The introductory section is all right, though 'hundreds of' is hardly encyclopaedic in tone. But the 'History' section is almost entirely puff: it gives no dates, names no important indivduals, and in fact contains hardly any history. Sections on organisation, funding, and buildings would be appropriate. ColinFine 22:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I've re-written parts of the article to sound less like it was written by the college marketing department. The whole article still needs a lot of work, especially the history section which is lacking references and is a glorified list of bullet points.

In the interests of full transparency, I work for the university next door which technically competes with the college, but I've tried to be fair when writing the article. Please edit it if you think it shows bias. NRTurner (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

If there is such a person as Steven P. Taylor and they are notable please provide a reference. -- Q Chris (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no reference, not appearing on Google - He's gone! -- Q Chris (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. No objections after two listing periods, and seems reasonable. — Amakuru (talk) 08:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bradford College, England → Bradford College – The current disambiguation page at Bradford College lists three possible articles, one of which is about a small (600-student) defunct institution that originated in 1803 and closed in 1999, and another is a short unreferenced article about a small institution (also 600 students) in Adelaide that opened in 2002. In contrast the subject of this article is a 25,000-student institution with a history stretching back to 1832. I sincerely believe this is the primary topic and as such it should be located at Bradford College and the current disambiguation page at Bradford College (disambiguation). A short hatnote would assist anyone looking for the two other articles. 92.40.249.59 (talk) 22:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Untitled

Advert

Rewrite

Dubious

Requested move 12 April 2016