Talk:Brenda Martin

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

[Untitled]

I think reference 5 is enough to prevent a speedy deletion of the article. Saying that someone is the subject of a parliamentary inquiry is not necessarily enough to pass AfD i n the absence of a good deal else, but is enough of an assertion of notability to pass speedy. DGG (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just have to say, this article seems overly sympathetic to Martin for an encyclopedia entry. Someone should change some of the language. I would prefer the original author to change it before I do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.150.81 (talk) 19:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

working illegaly

the reference cited makes no mention of whether she was working legally or not so I'd say unless we can find a source to back up this claim it be removed. Macutty (talk) 15:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay this is making Wikipedia a joke. This article it written to support the members of the press who lied and fabricated to get publicity for themselves. It certainly is overly subjective and not at all factual. Why is it allowed to be edited to outline a justification for all the lies rather than being objective and reflect the truth? Who continually is editing out any facts that do not support a sympathetic view of a very troubled, alcoholic fraud artist, not in my view, but in the view of the courts who found her guilty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthinpress (talk • contribs) 11:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely that this article is sympathetic to her. She was living in Mexico and engaging in illegal acts for several years before her detention. It can be argued that she was no longer Canadian and simply used Canada once she was caught doing illegal acts. Funny how she loves Canada now and wants to remain there according to recent interviews. That's the problem with citizenship, thousands of people keep citizenship to Western "modern" and democratic countries while living overseas, only so that they can use that citizenship when the sh*t hits the fan... either way, Brenda Martin shouldn't be protraid as a victim, especially since she's been found guilty of the crime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.38.30 (talk) 15:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are complete inaccuracies allowed to justify the lies the press told about this story? They commented privately how it was and I quote "Gawd awful journalism", yet they never had the conviction to tell the truth about it all. It is very sympathetic to her and likely penned by a member of that same press to allow them to vindicate themselves and their lies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthinpress (talk • contribs) 11:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The National Post Editors had the whole truth on this matter and one reporters sexual interest one of Brenda's supporters, thereby slanting his reporting and the trugh. It was swept under the carpet so Canadians would not be able to note the corruption in the press. While they happily intimidate and expose others, there is a sacred code to protect one another, as this matter proves beyond any doubt. There are reporters at the National Post, whom commented this was the worse reporting he had ever seen and although he wrote an article exposing it, his editors refused to allow it to run for their own reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthinpress (talk • contribs) 21:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other legal troubles

I moved the information about Martin's past legal troubles from the lead section into its own section, since it is not relevant to the rest of the article. In fact, I would suggest that it should probably be deleted altogether, since it has nothing to do with her arrest and conviction in Mexico, which is the focus of the article and why she is notable. Julesd 14:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Why are you so interested in hiding the truth, if she was convicted of fraud and she was convicted, why is it not relevant that she had been in fact mixing with criminals her whole life, before she cried to Canada, a country she had left, about her plight. Canadians were played like a violin and you want to hide it, why? What is your motivation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthinpress (talk • contribs) 21:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop trying to airbrush the truth, won't you? Pathetic attempts. You are obviously a supporter trying to pretend to being objective. You should know the press lied through their teeth on this matter to suck the public in to believing their version of events for political and personal reasons. The only truth is Brenda was convicted twice of fraudulent behaviour. Why not tell the truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthinpress (talk • contribs) 11:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Brenda Martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brenda Martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080225182552/http://www.canada.com:80/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=935631bf-acf6-44c8-96b4-bf425ea55317&k=51640 to http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=935631bf-acf6-44c8-96b4-bf425ea55317&k=51640

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brenda Martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080326212324/http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080322/casey_mexico_080322/20080322?hub=Canada to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080322/casey_mexico_080322/20080322?hub=Canada

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]