Talk:Britannia (board game)

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:BritanniaFFGlaidout.jpg

Image:BritanniaFFGlaidout.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction is misleading

If you only read the introduction, you get the impression this is a new game. The introduction should give the game's origins, or at least mention it is a re-release/new edition. CapnZapp (talk) 15:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - will come up with something. Stevebritgimp (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Template

Hello - a Wikiproject Template is on this talk page, saying this is Start class and Low importance - I'd probably disagree with both of those assessments, but that isn't a problem. If anything needs improving in the article please let me know, as I was involved in the development, so while I definitely have a conflict of interest I will know stuff that won't be public knowledge. I suppose I have to rely on myself to self-censor when it comes to that. Also I have been involved in the hobby outside of that and can bring info in. Basically if improvements are needed put a summary of what's needed up, and I can have a go at adding info as necessary. Cheers. Stevebritgimp (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to remember this making enough of a splash that I've upgraded it to 'Mid' importance. I'd say that it needs some info on how it was received (reviews and the like), and certainly any awards it has gotten. That would probably get it to the new 'C'-class in my eyes. A bit more on the development of the game (changes between versions would be good). Keep in mind that a core Wikipedia policy is verifiability, so anything you can source to a review, listing of awards, designer's notes article, would be a great help! --Rindis (talk) 21:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lew has a load of articles, and these are in various places on the net, so I might have a go at this, yes. I think there were awards and nominations for awards. There will be plenty of verifiable stuff on differences between versions. When I hae the inclination I will start digging. Stevebritgimp (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Am going to kick off a 'changes between versions' section. I'll add to this over the next few days, and try to find the best outside source for them. Watch this space. Stevebritgimp (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right have more or less done the prose part of the changes section - it will just need referencing. Stevebritgimp (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Britannia (board game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Britannia (board game" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Britannia (board game and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Britannia (board game until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]