This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Oppose: Undisscussed and proposed by a blocked users. They are two different articles one is about the state that existed from (1815–1948), British Ceylon, and the other, British Ceylon period, is about a historical period of Sri Lanka that spanned the same time. Both are sourced with many sources --Blackknight12 (talk) 14:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge: having carried out the unopposed (for 8 months) merge proposal, which has just been reversed, I saw heavy overlap. The British Ceylon period seeems to be an article by historians for historians, and my view is that this shouldn't be separate from the British Ceylon#History section; to split the content is unwarranted given the that the combined length is well below page size limit recommendations. So, the formal reasons for the merge would be overlap and context. Klbrain (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge. The British Ceylon period may be said to have started in 1802 with British settlements displacing other European control over the coastlands, whereas British Ceylon including control over the interior began with military victory over the Kingdom of Kandy in 1815; but that amounts to a relatively minor difference in scope. Other articles about colonies will cover a colonisation period where the foreign power may likewise have taken some years to become established. I see no benefit in maintaining two articles with such closely overlapping scope. – FayenaticLondon22:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.