Talk:Browne Issue System
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Advantages
[edit]I've added a little text under the 'advantages' section. It's a proven method of managing loan libraries, so I suspect it may still be used in locations where the library is small and so a computerised system is overkill, or in locations where finances are limited or electricity infrastructure/computer systems cannot be easily achieved (e.g. developing countries, remote locations). Perhaps a current library practitioner can add some text here and suitable references? Also, are there alternative non-computer based systems in use which are considered better than the Browne system? Perhaps librarians working in developing countries/ locations without guaranteed electrical supplies might be able to comment and strengthen this article. regards --mgaved (talk) 11:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Browne Issue System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060917144958/http://www.slq.qld.gov.au/serv/publib/cls/manual/day to http://www.slq.qld.gov.au/serv/publib/cls/manual/day
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)