Talk:Buccaneer Yacht Club
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Speedy deletion
[edit]Please do not delete this page. Editors work in real time and not in bot time. It normally takes a few days to get an article up and running, especially when the editor has to live in the real world.Trilobitealive (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have changed the CSD tag to a PROD nomination, which gives you five days to bring the article up to inclusion standards. Please be sure to read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Good luck. — Satori Son 15:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, the PROD is fine, but when I first looked at it I didn't see any major assertion of notability and I tried looking for sources.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well thank you. At this point I've added sufficient references and discussion for it to be equally notable (in my humble opinion) to a many of the sports related articles I've seen on Wikipedia. I've been introduced to an interesting controversy today, that which might be loosely termed writers versus erasers. Erasers have been around a long time, (see Library of Alexandria) but they've been flying under my radar here up to now.Trilobitealive (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, the tool we administrators use here is not an eraser, it's called The Mop. And if it was never used, we'd all be wading in shit. But, you did a nice job getting this article up to standards. Thanks. — Satori Son 13:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well thank you. At this point I've added sufficient references and discussion for it to be equally notable (in my humble opinion) to a many of the sports related articles I've seen on Wikipedia. I've been introduced to an interesting controversy today, that which might be loosely termed writers versus erasers. Erasers have been around a long time, (see Library of Alexandria) but they've been flying under my radar here up to now.Trilobitealive (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, the PROD is fine, but when I first looked at it I didn't see any major assertion of notability and I tried looking for sources.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletion contested
[edit]At this point I'm contesting the deletion process and removing the notice from the article. This article is sufficiently notable at this time.Trilobitealive (talk) 22:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It looks like this article is up and running so I'm moving on to something else.Regards all.Trilobitealive (talk) 00:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Buccaneer Yacht Club (Alabama). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310211531/http://www.fishclass.org/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=2&MMN_position=2%3A2 to http://www.fishclass.org/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=2&MMN_position=2%3A2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)