Talk:Car model

Automobiles Top‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Separate the concept of trim level from car model

I think that we must separate the concept of trim level from car model. A car model has the same body but may have different trims. I propose to merge this Car model article with the Body style and/or Brand or marque articles, and to merge Trim level with the Trim packages article. Aldo L (talk) 15:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Engineering point of view for defining the concept of car model

I expanded the article focusing in the engineering point of view for defining the concept of car model. Maybe, now the merger could go directly to Automaker, or it could continue to be a stand-alone article. The Body style and Trim package articles link to this article and that could be sufficient for them. Aldo L (talk) 02:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, no more WP policy violations at this article

As the cleanup tag notes, none of this material is verifiable; the only inline citations are to Car and Driver (or similar) pages that show an example of the car/idea mentioned in the text. There is not a single reference given to any idea appearing in this article. It is another example of another "just trust us" article, that violates WP:OR and WP:VERIFY. Le Prof. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]