This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
the German wikipedia calls him Carl, he never used any other spelling but Carl throughout his life. So why Karl in English?
Dunnhaupt22:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good question (the answer surely isn't modern use as reflected in Google hits and modern references, say, which I think are less important for such a question anyway and which give the answer that "Karl Friedrich Abel" receives half as many hits - 14,500 - as "Carl Friedrich Abel" anyway, so even if that were a good answer it would be the wrong one.) Schissel | Sound the Note!17:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Walter Knape, who devoted practically his entire life to Abel (complete edition of the scores, catalogue raisonné, many other publications on Abel, e.g. "Walter Knape: Karl (sic!) Friedrich Abel, Leben und Werk eines frühklassischen Komponisten, Bremen 1973") always wrote Abel's name with K. This spelling has therefore survived in many places to this day. Guentersberg (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
More than 10 years later, I have reached the same conclusion. The image of Abel with his viola da gamba should be first, and the other Gainsborough portrait later in the article. could someone with the experience to do so please add this image? Humphrey Tribble (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And again more than a year later I took the image to the article, however in the second position, because the image traditionally identifying him show both instrument and composing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
at least one inaccuracy, probably more. WK 42 is for oboe, violin and cello and orchestra, not oboe quartet (oboe, violin, viola, cello) and orchestra, to judge from the parts as described at RISM and uploaded to IMSLP. Schissel | Sound the Note!21:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
