Talk:Catalpa rescue

Australia: Western Australia / Crime / Maritime B‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Catalpa rescue is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Secret Societies (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies articles

Irish Maritime

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Irish MaritimeWikipedia:WikiProject Irish MaritimeTemplate:WikiProject Irish MaritimeIrish Maritime articles

Freopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiTown Freopedia.FreopediaWikipedia:FreopediaTemplate:FreopediaFreopedia articles

Irish republicanism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Catalpa rescue was copied or moved into Fremantle Prison with this edit on 11 October 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Motion picture

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_irish/index.html?campaign=pbshomefeatures_4_secretsofthedeadbririshescape_2007-05-17

With some interest I note that filming in Australia is about to begin on a Motion picture epic called The Catalpa Rescue.petedavo 10:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for giving us this link. The film was made in Australia by Lisa Sabina Harney. It could be seen today on Arte (German/French TV) under the title Flucht aus dem Höllenkerker. Die legendäre Fahrt der Catalpa. I wonder why there is no translation of this article to more other languages. --13Peewit (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

what became of the six escapees?

any references? according to PBS, some or all could not adjust, hard labor etc too long....io-io (talk) 03:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Kiely

James Keily's account differs from that in the article [West Australian, 24 Feb 1905]

He states that he was part of the escape plot, but was unable to join due to an attentive warder.

The Catalpa arrived in New York in 1877, not 76 as stated in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.181.132.42 (talk) 05:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Catalpa rescue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whaleship vs whaleboat

Some of the early literature refers to Catalpa as a "whaleboat", which is fine. However, for our purposes I prefer "whaleship" for the reason that the word "whaleboat" more usually denotes one of the long rowboats which were lowered to go in pursuit of a whale (like the one which was used to transport the convict escapees out to sea). The colloquial "whaler" is regularly applied to both types of craft. Bjenks (talk) 04:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pease/Anthony book

This book was ghosted by Pease on behalf of Anthony, and it is self-published by Anthony, so has no independent editorial oversight, even by the standards of the 19th century. Anthony was a sailor, not a writer or historian in any way. So it is not a RS Bumbubookworm (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A fine point which would be most relevant to any disputed, questionable or controversial matters covered (which you might want to identify). The WP policy on verifiability specifies that "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they are published experts in the field, so long as:

the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;
it does not involve claims about third parties;
it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and
the article is not based primarily on such sources."

Besides which, a ship's master may deemed to exercise far more expertise and accountability than an ordinary sailor, his duties including complex project and personnel management, navigation, record-keeping, communication with port authorities, etc, etc. And, as we know, Anthony was part of an activist community which included proficient journalists, editors, lawyers, etc. Bjenks (talk) 03:41, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bumbubookworm--You need to answer the above and demonstrate that your rejection of the source is justified notwithstanding its clear eligibility under WP:V. If you are unable to do so, you should consider reviewing relevant edits.Bjenks (talk) 15:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]