Jump to content

Talk:Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge discussion

[edit]

I don't see why Central Texas Turnpike System should be a separate page. The tollways within the system are all built and maintained by the RMA.

  • Support - The turnpike system could be included as a section of this article. Dough4872 00:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merger. Imzadi 1979  07:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - To the best of my knowledge, CTTS (SH 130, Loop 1, SH 45) was built by and is maintained by the Texas Turnpike Authority, which is part of TxDOT. CTRMA operates 183A (and will operate the US 290 Turnpike East of Austin). If CTRMA has taken over administration of the CTTS toll roads, please let me know. That said, I don't know how important CTTS is as a separate concept from something more inclusive like "toll roads in central texas". Deh (talk) 02:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The CTTS article is a three-paragraph stub article. I now see that CTRMA doesn't control all of them, so perhaps the CTRMA roads should be listed on that page with the TTA routes, along with others around the state, in the article Texas Tollways which is an article in need of improvement anyhow. Fortguy (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose—two different agencies. Imzadi 1979  13:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Central Texas Turnpike System and the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority are separate entities that operate separate roadways. Do not merge them.

The paragraph about a talk show comment should be excised.

[edit]

The comment about a Charlie Hodge radio show is trivial and inconsequential and does not pass the standard of being encyclopedic.____ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Cullick (talkcontribs) 20:42, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Projects section

[edit]

The Projects section is an ugly mess. There is a whole paragraph apparently copied from the website (which isn't even cited), and it lacks sufficient citations in general. The different projects should probably be in a table. Intrinsicanomaly (talk) 21:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]