Jump to content

Talk:Charlotte Coyle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Asserted Importance

[edit]

Sure there isn't much listed, but from what has been written about her she's no less worthy of a page than any of the other plus-size models on here. Not to mention she's listed in the plus-sized models main article. Johnbiggs 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've added just some of the extensive television and print publicity that Charlotte has been given. Her Daily Telegraph article was actually featured on the cover of the newspaper. There is more, which I can add if it is required, but there is no question about her notability. Her Channel 4 documentary was seen by 2.3 million viewers. Neckapply 17:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, her show had good ratings, but how many people would remember the show or her name now? She's invisible as far as modeling work goes over the last year. She has her limited notability listed on the plus-size model page; she isn't notable enough for her own article. Much of her other listed 'accomplishments' are in the usual line of work for a model AntiVanity (talk) 10:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • A show of over two million viewers, the cover of The Telegraph and a major article therein, articles in The Guardian, The Sun, and various other British newspapers, appearances on ITV's This Morning program, an interview on Richard and Judy...this more than meets the criterion of celebrity notability, and it is also NOT "in the usual line of work for a model" at all. Far from it, as most models achieve little or no media acknowledgment, and simply perform anonymously. How many models star in a show of over two million viewers, or get interviewed by a major British network show?) Notability also isn't measured by "what have you done for me lately" or just what someone has done in one field. She achieved major media coverage, and an article here covering that is more than warranted. Merlotry (talk) 06:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Charlotte Coyle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Coyle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]