Jump to content

Talk:Chevrolet Corvette (C2)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Horsepower at rpm?

[edit]

Just an observation. This article and the main article for Chevy Corvette does not state at what revolutions per minute that the engine achieves the stated horsepower. Is there a reason it it is omitted? Is this something to cleanup? I seem to remember that "muscle cars" often had modest hp ratings for insurance purposes. In this day-and-age I would think some classic (as-in orginal trim) Corvette fan would have posted their dyno tape as a nice graph. --Charles Gaudette 19:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be an excellent addition to wikipedia, especially on the big block page where there is a breakdown of exactly which engines produced which horsepower. Please feel free to add it if you can! Mrand 20:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assemblage

[edit]

Would be nice to know, where the cars have been assembled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.123.65.203 (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sting Ray"

[edit]

Is it Corvette Stingray or Corvette Sting Ray? Is there an official spelling? It's written both ways in the article. Perhaps, for the sake of consistency, a single spelling should be chosen for the article.--Patriotic dissent (talk) 08:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is an official spelling. For the C2 generation, it is two words. For the C3 generation it is one word. Having said that, the only place in the article where I see the one word usage is in reference to Mitchell's concept car, which appears to have used word... so I don't see anything in the article that needs to change. —Mrand TalkC 14:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a scrap book

[edit]

The Wikipedia page Chevrolet Corvette C2 is a page of an online encylopedia, not a scrap book or fan page. Content should be added only when it germanely increases the informativeness of the article; likewie images. The page is not an archive for all data ever generated on Generation II Corvettes. Wikiuser100 (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page viability

[edit]

This page seems to have deteriorated over that past few months. These is no real discussion on cars which are significant, like the L88s (which wasn't produced until early 1967 unlike what the article states), but there is a section (which should be deleted) devoted to a completely insignificant vehicle (the Rondine). There is at best, poor development of the year over year changes to the car. Even the picture titles are misleading. Nobody every calls the later coupes "single-window coupes". There needs to be some agreement on how this page is presented. The changes seems willy-nilly. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mekozak (talkcontribs) 14:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph of Corvette Grand Sport #002

[edit]

The photograph of Corvette Grand Sport #002 is not of the original car - it is of a duplicate. I know, it is my picture the 2003 Amelia Island Concours d'elegance. The real 002 is being driven. I guess since I added it I have to find a legal photo of the correct one. Toneron2 (talk) 01:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chevrolet Corvette (C2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]