This article is totally biased and misunderstanding of the Classical Chinese Writers. As a Classical Chinese Writer, I will memorize many ancient books, but just quote some passages when needed, and usually cited the name of the books or the authors. It is not just my habit, but also the habit of most Classical Chinese Writers, and you can check this in one famous Classical Chinese book named as Guwen Guanzhi.--KongMing (talk) 02:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

agreed

this article is totally wrong. classical Chinese writers do quote or cite lots of phrases, words or stories from ancient books, as it's the tradition in China as far as I know to make thier works more reliable. to my knowledge, classical Chinese writers are far from so called plagiarists. --a John Doe in Shanghai(203.193.15.207 (talk) 09:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]