Talk:Coastal Corporation

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Houston (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Coastalcorp.com

Unfortunately http://www.coastalcorp.com/ is blocked by robots.txt. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

As a former employee of Coastal I can attest that the article appears to be factually correct. However, my efforts to "improve" the entry by adding citations is a frustrating task. Bluntly, there is damn all online to which I make links. I have all kinds of paper in my possession that could - I suppose - be scanned and placed online. Aside from the effort involved, I am concerned that I could be infringing copyright or confidentiality by doing this. What's a body to do? Should this entry be erased? I seems a poor use of the internet if history has to be deleted because it doesn't have a great enough online presence.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.0.210.96 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations need not be available online to be referenced. So long as your references satusfy the REliable Sources policy, they can be added. Please also remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end of your post. Kindzmarauli (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Coastal Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140408214814/http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2003/06/23/344612/ to http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2003/06/23/344612/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]