Talk:Colossal Biosciences

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Extinction

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Notability Tag?

Kj cheetham - Bit surprised by this. There has been a huge litany of mainstream coverage of Colossal. I'm not sure all the coverage is warranted, but fact is that it exists. I think this page would easily survive AfD. Could we remove the tag? NickCT (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my initial concern was all the coverage I saw seemed to be around 13-17th September about the company funding and launch, which seemed like a WP:NEWSEVENT rather than significant coverage of the (very new) company itself, so could have been a case of WP:TOOSOON. Can you point to some independant significant coverage since then? I wouldn't object if someone removed the tag though, as probably does still meet WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kj cheetham: - Yeah, I get your point. And hey, you might be right. Maybe they fail and never get anymore coverage.

If I were to make a counter-point, it would be that even though this business only came in to being recently, the set of people behind the business and their effort has been noted for several years. See this for example. NickCT (talk) 17:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is an element of WP:CRYSTALBALL. It's very possible some of the people behind it are notable as individual in their own right. I've not looked into that, but I did see that George Church at least already has an article. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely WP:CRYSTALBALL-y.

I wonder what mammoth tastes like. NickCT (talk) 19:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]