Talk:Command Decision (Dad's Army)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Command Decision (Dad's Army) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2008. The result of the discussion was no concensus (default keep)..

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Dad's Army / Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dad's Army task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

the bizarre antics of Jack Merridew[edit]

Jack why are you removing sources? [1] Have you read McCann's book? I urge you again to not be a fanatic. Catchpole (talk) 10:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should watch the personal attacks. You must have seen the edit summary where I said "this book is about the show, not this episode; moving it to shows article". It was already there, but I adjusted it to use {{cite book}}. --Jack Merridew 10:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- According to Amazon reviewers, it also documents each episode individually. Uncle G (talk) 13:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of just reverting each other again and again, why don't you discuss it here? Pairadox (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]