Talk:Commander Keen/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 08:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Let's do this thing. Cognissonance (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Overall[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- The copyvio and external links checked out.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- It was focused, it was major, it was legendary.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Nothing is more neutral than this article.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- We have achieved peace, at last.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All is appropriate. I didn't see a nipslip, anywhere.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall: The review produced no notes and as such did not have a single issue. Immediate pass.
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: