Talk:Commontime (album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Commontime (album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Commontime (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 2, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Commontime (album) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Field Music album Commontime received media attention after Prince tweeted about one of its songs?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Commontime (album).

Wikipedia

Requested move 30 December 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. wbm1058 (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commontime (album) → Commontime – Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, enough to disambiguate from Common time. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Galobtter: Better discuss. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll add some more explanation - does make sense to redirect "Common time" to time signature where it is discussed, but not "Commontime" as no one will be searching for 4/4 (common) time without the space. They'll be likely looking for the album. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, fails WP:SMALLDETAILS test - not consistent or distinctive; Time signature is also sometimes used without gap, album is sometimes used with gap. Plus in books CommonTime is a calendaring and scheduling app for Lotus Notes. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've searched, and as far as I can see the album is always called "commontime" without the space and the signature is always called "common time" (I've never heard it otherwise). Not only that, people should be directed to wherever they want to go. Most likely they are looking for the album when looking without a space, and there's a hatnote towards time signature (The general approach is that whatever readers might type in the search box, they are guided as swiftly as possible to the topic they might reasonably be expected to be looking for, by such disambiguation techniques as hatnotes and/or disambiguation pages.When such navigation aids are in place). Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But it's more that more sources refer to www.commontime.com and the CommonTime apps. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to have an article though. So mostly people would want the album. And it is again consistently capitalized differently from the album, so differentiated. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't have to have an article, the universe exists independently of Wikipedia, so do readers. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – small details does not say this is an improvement. Disambiguation is good. Dicklyon (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – unless they made a "typo", at least one editor did treat it as a compound word: you should always check "what links here" before making such proposals. In Cantique de Jean Racine: "The music is in D-flat major, in commontime, marked Andante. – wbm1058 (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA?[edit]

@Hunter Kahn: Thanks for your work on this article (and nice profile page, by the way! ;p) -- I hope you have Good article nomination plans. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Another Believer! Yes, I plan to bring it to GAN, and I have just a few finishing touches left before doing so. In fact, I previously worked Open Here to GA status, and have plans to eventually continue working my way backwards through Field Music's discography in this way. Suffice it to say, I'm a big fan of the band. :D — Hunter Ka hn 17:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hunter Kahn, Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Prince

... that the Field Music album Commontime received media attention after Prince (pictured) tweeted about one of its songs?
- ALT1:... that Prince (pictured) tweeted about a song from the Field Music album Commontime, but the band wasn't initially sure whether he liked it or not?

Reviewed: Swan Lake fire
Comment: I prefer the first hook, personally...
Comment: The same image of Prince has been proposed with the Aug 12 hook for Steve McClellan. For either, my opinion is that using an image of Prince is a reach. David notMD (talk) 19:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm fine with dropping the pic if that is the preference of whoever ends up reviewing this... — Hunter Ka hn 19:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self-nominated at 03:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

The article was expanded enough and in time. A QPQ has been completed. The original hook is directly cited. There are no copyright violations. The only problem that I can see is that the Track listing section needs to be referenced. SL93 (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks SL93. I added a citation to the label's page for teh track listing section... — Hunter Kahn 02:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm approving the original hook. I'm not sure about anything related to the image, but I'm sure that the promoter can make a decision. SL93 (talk) 15:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]