Talk:Confessions Tour/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Righty-ho, I am reading through now and am making straightforward changes as I go. Please revert any where I inadvertently change the meaning. Queries below. Also, don't automatically do what I suggest - if you think otherwise please say so and we can discuss. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Among the various props present was a $2 million disco ball embellished in $2 million worth of Swarovski crystals - 4 mill total?
- Yes of course :) Is the structure correct? --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I guess it is a little confusing as the two number values are the same. I have been thinking about this a bit. Maybe changing the second bit to - "embellished with a further $2 million worth of Swarovski crystals makes it sound moer clear. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

~~Images need WP:ALT text.~~ Gah! that'll teach me to cut and paste better... Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As per this link, the images already have alternate text. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

- ~~pending outcome of review of key image really. I think it qualifies but best to get it sorted out now.~~ Article required little tweaking - well done. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:49, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, even Im waiting for that only. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grrrr. The image was ultimately deleted, hence no non-free images exist now in the article. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done and dusted. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]