Talk:Contemporary Japan
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I feel that the change in classification from "journal" to "magazine" was ill-advised. The citation from John Dower in the lead described it as a "periodical".CurtisNaito (talk) 23:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's not an academic journal, it's not a newspaper or newsletter, that pretty much leaves a magazine. --Randykitty (talk) 23:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)