Talk:Corneal ulcers in animals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human or Animal Medical Condition?

Is this page about a condition that afflicts humans or dogs? It mentions humas briefly at the beginning, but the rest of the article seems to be vetinary in nature. --Corinthian 00:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Corneal ulcers affect humans, dogs, and other animals. A veterinarian was largely responsible for the creation of this article. -AED 00:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added a disambiguation to the start of the article, pointing toward corneal abrasion, which discusses corneal ulcers in humans. --Joelmills 03:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abrasions and ulcers are two different things. Both can affect humans and non-human species. -AED 04:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They both involve loss of the epithelium, but I guess the definition of corneal ulcers also includes deeper loss of corneal tissue. As far as I know, most of the veterinary community uses the term corneal ulcer when referring to any loss of corneal epithelium. How is a corneal ulcer different than a corneal abrasion in human ophthalmology terminology? Either way it works out, with the significant differences in causes and treatment, I think it is convenient to keep the articles separate. --Joelmills 00:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abrasion implies physical or mechanical disruption of the epithelium, whereas ulcer implies an inflammatory cause. I would suggest expanding both articles to reflect that each occurs in human and veterinary medicine. AED 00:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. --Joelmills 01:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Refractory corneal ulcers

This is not a synonym for recurrent corneal abrasion or erosion, which is what the author (capably) describes. Because infectious corneal ulcers have a different etiology and are so treated from corneal erosions, this material should be moved out of the ulcer topic.Bticho 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

I think I'm going to be bold and rename this article Corneal ulcers in animals. There is still very little about the human aspect of the condition except for the infobox and a bit about culturing. For now corneal ulcer can redirect here, until someone wants to write an article about the human disease. I know we discussed this earlier and it was decided to keep corneal ulcer and corneal abrasion and their respective human and veterinary information separate, but in veterinary medicine the term corneal ulcer is used whether or not the etiology is inflammatory or traumatic. I don't know who started that trend, but that's the way it is. My concern is that this article is going to confuse anyone looking for information on the human condition. I'll wait a few days for discussion before moving it. --Joelmills 00:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation relevant to humans

Thanks for letting me know at the WP:Eye talk pages for the Wikiproject on Ophthalmology. I have removed information concerning the animals, which is appropriately contained in Corneal ulcers in animals. I will try to find some pictures for the article. I need some help with the creation of infobox and referencing, along with general proofreading for grammatical errors thay may have inadvertently crept in. Anybody?! EyeMD ^T|C 13:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to WikiVet

This article contains much of the same content as an article on WikiVet. Corneal Ulcer - Horse

As far as I can tell, neither one gives an attribution to the other, as required under terms of the Creative Commons licence.

What is the relationship between these pages? Should a citation be given to WikiVet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marchino61 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]