Talk:Coughs and sneezes spread diseases
Coughs and sneezes spread diseases has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 2, 2020. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that coughs and sneezes spread diseases (poster shown)? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Song
[edit]I'm pretty sure that I've heard the lyric "Coughs and sneezes spread diseases" sung to the tune of "Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser", better known as the tune of Das Lied der Deutschen, or as it is more popularly known, "Deutschland über Alles". We need a sourced paragraph. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Coughs and sneezes spread diseases/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 16:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
- Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
- Contains a short description which complies with recommendations.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
- All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
- All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
- Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
- No original research.
- No copyright violations or plagiarism.
- Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
- Neutral.
- Stable.
- Illustrated, if possible.
- Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.
I'll be happy to do this review. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello again, AFreshStart, hope you are using your handkerchief and are free of coughs and sneezes. So, this is short and straight to the point, like the advice it describes. No doubt at all that it is a good article. I'll do the necessary at WP:GA. Well done and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! Same goes to you too 🙂 —AFreshStart (talk) 20:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Health and fitness articles
- Low-importance Health and fitness articles
- WikiProject Health and fitness articles
- GA-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- GA-Class virus articles
- Low-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles