Jump to content

Talk:Coulrophilia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 21:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Di (they-them) (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Di (they-them) (talk) 22:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Well that's a quite interesting topic. Everything checks out! Skyshiftertalk 19:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Di (they-them) and Skyshifter: Hold it. What makes Vice and the Mirror reliable?--Launchballer 17:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Both Vice and Mirror are listed on WP:RSP as having no consensus regarding reliability. For the purposes that they are used for in this article however, I think that they are reliable. Mirror is simply serving as a secondary source reporting on statistics of a website, XHamster, which published its own data. Meanwhile the sources from Vice feature interviews as well as information about the online community. Di (they-them) (talk) 21:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

previous AFDs

[edit]

should probably list the previous AFDs on the talk page - David Gerard (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, added. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]