Talk:David Pepper (intelligence official)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics of the United Kingdom High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Pepper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827152543/http://www.gchq.gov.uk/press/new_director.html to http://www.gchq.gov.uk/press/new_director.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the pages at this time, per the discussion below, and create a new disambiguation page at David Pepper. Dekimasuよ! 22:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– I don't think that either David Edwin Pepper (currently at David Pepper) or David Andrew Pepper (currently at David A. Pepper) are the primary topic for the name "David Pepper". If anything, I think David Andrew Pepper is the more primary of the two, as Googling "david pepper" primarily shows results about him, and David Edwin Pepper isn't mentioned until the 8th result on page 2. The page views favor David Andrew Pepper's page slightly, but not by much (however, David Edwin Pepper's page may be getting false hits since it currently holds the article title "David Pepper"). However, it's worth noting that both of these results are skewed by recentness; David Andrew Pepper is presently active as a politician and writer, while David Edwin Pepper doesn't seem to be up to much since his position as GCHQ Director ended in 2008.

Basically, I think that a) the current article at "David Pepper" is definitely not the primary topic, and b) arguably, there isn't a primary topic at all. Thus, both of these pages should be moved to disambiguated titles, and a disambiguation page should be created at "David Pepper". I prefer parenthetical disambiguation (e.g. "David Pepper (British)" and "David Pepper (American)") to disambiguation using middle names/initials (e.g. "David E. Pepper" and "David A. Pepper") because neither of these individuals is commonly referred to by their full name. I support disambiguating by nationality (e.g. "(British)" and "(American)") because I think it's the least confusing option. Disambiguating by occupation is more commonly used (e.g. "David Pepper (civil servant)" and "David Pepper (politician)"), but it would be confusing in this case because "politician" and "civil servant" are very similar and overlapping terms. I guess we could do "David Pepper (British civil servant)" and "David Pepper (American politician)", but that seems needlessly non-concise. After reading WP:NCPDAB, I have changed my proposal to "David Pepper (intelligence official)" (instead of "David Pepper (British)") and "David Pepper (politician)" (instead of "David Pepper (American)"). IagoQnsi (talk) 23:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I've just discovered WP:NCPDAB, which lays out the policy for disambiguating people with the same name. It seems that using nationality by itself for parenthetical disambiguation is more unconventional than I had thought. Perhaps "David Pepper (intelligence official)" and "David Pepper (politician)" would be better than my above proposal? –IagoQnsi (talk) 23:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those sound more standard to me. I think it's early enough that you can just revise the templates to reflect those suggestions, if you want. Dekimasuよ! 23:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dekimasu:

Done –IagoQnsi (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per detailed nomination. There is, indeed, no primary topic and it is clear that the politician and author does not use the middle initial "A." Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support GNews In ictu oculi (talk) 09:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom - no clear primary topic for "David Pepper". Paintspot Infez (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The director of a national communications intelligence agency in a major country seems considerably more notable to me than a local politician. Although he can be moved to David Pepper (politician). -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion. I just checked, and there is nothing prohibiting the use of *two* identifying terms, as in David Pepper (politician & author) or David Pepper (American politician & author). Such a designation might be helpful considering people's searches for him might be instigated by his work in either area of accomplishment. WebMaven2000 (talk) 00:31, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@WebMaven2000: It's not explicitly disallowed, but it is definitely less concise and a bit unexpected. We should try to pick one title in my opinion. I think he's far better known for his political career--I'm not sure he would even meet WP:N if you take away his political career. For what it's worth, both of his books are political thrillers, so someone looking for the author probably wouldn't be too surprised by the label "politician". --IagoQnsi (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, generally avoided. And we don't need a national identifier if there's only one of them. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.