Talk:Debasement Tapes

Debasement Tapes has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Debasement Tapes is part of the Veronica Mars (season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 3, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
June 28, 2016	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 24, 2016.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the crew of Veronica Mars had wanted Paul Rudd to guest star on the show for several years before his eventual appearance in the episode "Debasement Tapes"?

Current status: Good article

Television: Veronica Mars Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Veronica Mars task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Debasement Tapes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this for a review. Miyagawa (talk) 18:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, review time.

"Veronica discovers that Desmond’s bag was actually switched with another person’s bag" - you can drop the "bag" from the end of the sentence as I think it's pretty inherent and it'll reduce the repetition.
Having the citation in the middle of the sentence at the start of production just looks really messy. I understand why it's there (as I presume that you're intending to show which parts of that sentence are cited to which. So could you throw in a comma at the same place just so that it follows a punctuation mark?
Production and Reception are interestingly written.
No duplicate links.
Image licence is good.
References are all good, although I recommend archiving the rest of the web citations.

@Johanna: That's everything, once those couple of points have been fixed, I'll be happy to promote. Miyagawa (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Miyagawa: I have fixed all your concerns. I moved that first citation to the end of the sentence. I decided only to archive a few of the links (the ones that I know are likely to move or be erratic), but if you insist, I will do the same with all of them. Thanks! Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 03:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Johanna: Thanks. I should have said - the archive stuff wasn't a requirement for the GA, just some advice. I get twitchy about web citations as for the Star Trek stuff which had a great website with historical archives called TrekWeb... which randomly and all of a sudden ceased to exist. Because of that we've lost a wealth of knowledge for the 2000 to 2010 period, which isn't covered by a lot of other sources. I digress, good choice on the citation. Happy to pass. Miyagawa (talk) 08:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Debasement Tapes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5sTfGSFt1?url=http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=050807_09 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=050807_09

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]