Talk:Decretum Gratiani

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Decretum Gratiani article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Catholicism: Canon law Top‑importance

Decretum Gratiani is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Catholic canon law task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Christianity: Texts Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Mid-importance).

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mistake

"...sometimes mistakenly called the Concordantia discordantium canonum" How confident are we that this is actually a mistake?

Peter Stein refers to the document in this way in 'Roman Law in European History' pg 49.

This spelling is also used in 'A History of Private Law in Europe' by Franz Wieacker in the English Translation by Tony Weir, pg 49.

Although neither of the authors are canon law specialists, they are formidable academics. Mrheathcliff 05:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gratian and marriage

I'm not sure how to include this, but we ought to include something about his theories of marriage (ie, matrimonium initiatum and matrimonium ratum) here. Got any suggestions about where it should be included in the article? The Jade Knight 06:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is a key moment in the history of Canon law, but I think I would make only a small mention of it here. It truly deserves it's place in history of marriage, because it was part of how modern marriage came to be understood.

It also needs to pointed out that Gratian's work was NEVER an official document, even though it was virtually treated as one.DaveTroy 19:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

check the promulagation

CIC was in force until 1918. Benedict promulaged teh code in 1917, but it did not have legally binding force until Pentacost 1918.DaveTroy 19:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred Text from Corpus Juris Canonici

The article Corpus Juris Canonici is a general article, and it had way too much info on the Decretum. I left a nice intro section there, but moved the rest here. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 00:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Decretum Gratiani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402122239/http://www.t-j-l.de/Sg-Entw.PDF to http://www.t-j-l.de/Sg-Entw.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]